Wednesday, 28 December 2011

Paarl Gimnasium Motto

http://www.soliustitiae.co.za/blog/2010/09/02/origin-of-sol-iustitiae-illustra-nos/


What is the origin of the motto “Sol Iustitiae Illustra Nos”?

Many a visitor enters the building of the Faculty of Theology of the University of Stellenbosch without taking any notice of the motto written on the gable in the centre. The few who do notice the motto “sol iustitiae illustra nos” might not be aware of how it became part of the building erected in 1905.

Dutch Ancestry

The very same motto was accepted by the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands, way back in 1636. This Latin motto was gleaned from a literal Latin translation of Malachi 4:2 and can be rendered as: “Son of righteousness shine upon us”.
But how did the motto get from the Netherlands on to a gable in Stellenbosch? Many theological students from South Africa studied during the eighteenth and nineteenth century at the University of Utrecht and when the Theological Seminary started in 1859, the Curatorium proposed that the fledgling institution choose the same motto.

Similar Motto’s

The Faculty of Theology at Stellenbosch is not the only institution that emulated the University of Utrecht with regards to their motto:
  • In 1766 when Rutgers University in New Jersey (USA) was founded, it decided on a motto similar to Utrecht University: “sol iustitiae et occidentem illustra”. This adapted motto can be translated as “sun of righteousness shine upon the west also”. (Perhaps Stellenbosch can consider contextualizing the motto by referring the need of the south to be illuminated!?)
  • Closer to home the old and well known Strooidakkerk in Paarl decided to mention this motto in the western gable of the church that was erected in 1805.
  • The same motto was accepted in 1858 by the Paarl Gimnasium when the local DRC minister GWA van der Lingen (an alumnus of Utrecht University) suggested it. In a similar vein one can note that the school newspaper of Paarl Gimnasium is appropriately known as “Sollie”!

Brief Notes on Malachi 4:2

Without indulging in a lengthy sermon, the following brief notes can be made of Malachi 4:2 – with special emphasis on the translation of the construct – genitive phrase shemesh tsedaqa that is used only once in the whole Hebrew Bible:
  • As an attributive genitive the phrase can be rendered as an adjective = “a righteous or just sun” (Calvin choose this option!).
  • Most commentators prefer to translate the phrase as an epexigetical genitive that translates the genitive as an explanation of the noun = “a sun of righteousness”.
  • This phrase forms part of the sixth oracle in the book of Malachi in which the relationship between God and his people is discussed and explained.
  • The phrase must be closely related to Malachi’s expectation that the Day of the Lord as a day of judgment will soon take place during which the justice of the Lord will manifest itself.
  • The late dating of Malachi makes it probable that one should interpret this oracle in the context of the Persian Empire during which the Zaroastrian god Ahuramazda was venerated as the god of justice. Therefore expecting Yahweh as the “sun of righteousness” was a polemical alternative to Ahuramazda (who was represented by a winged sun disk in Persian iconography).

Tuesday, 20 December 2011

Paarlse skole lewer mense van statuur

http://152.111.1.87/argief/berigte/dieburger/1987/03/07/4/48.html

FOTO: KLEUR HET VERSKYN OP BLADSY 5 Deur ALIDA LA GRANGE DIE Paarlse skole is landwyd bekend. Dit is ook geen wonder nie as 'n mens in ag neem dat die eerste onderwyser, Jacob de Groot, reeds in 1700 in Drakenstein aangestel is. Van die dorp se skole het al talle ministers en Springbokke opgelewer en vandag nog sorg die rugby-interskole tussen die Hoër Jongenskool en die Hoërskool Gimnasium landwyd vir groot opwinding. Oud-leerlinge reis van tot Suidwes na die Paarl vir dié jaarlikse kragmeting. Die bekende Gimnasiumskool is in 1858 deur ds. G.W.A. van der Lingen gestig, onder meer omdat die openbare skole in die gebied (wat reeds sedert 1841 bestaan het) volgens hom nie genoeg aandag aan godsdiensonderrig gegee het nie en hy teen Engels as voertaal gekant was. Die skool is onder toesig van die kerk opgerig en mnr. T. Hoffman was die eerste skoolhoof. In 'n sekere mate kan dit as die grondlegging van Christelik-nasionale onderwys in die land beskou word. Die kerkraad het niks met die interne reëlings van die skool te doen gehad nie, maar geldelik 'n bydrae gemaak. Ds. Van der Lingen het 'n besondere voorliefde vir Hollands gehad en die onderwysers was hoofsaaklik Hollanders. Die skool het nooit 'n gebrek aan leerlinge gehad nie en sy uitslae was altyd goed. Ds. Van der Lingen het hardvogtig geweier dat Engels as voertaal - selfs in die onderrig van Latyn - toegelaat word, omdat hy bang was dat die departement van onderwys dalk seggenskap in die sake van die skool kon kry. Die kerkraad moes dikwels kollekteer en ds. Van der Lingen het groot somme geld uit sy eie sak opgedok om die skoolfonds gesond te hou. Die gimnasium het van 1886 af staatsondersteuning ontvang, maar die kerk het die geboue in stand gehou. In 1907 is die geboue aan die departement van onderwys verhuur en in 1917 het die departement dit gekoop. Dit huisves vandag die Laerskool Gimnasium. Die Hoërskool Gimnasium, wat in 1958 'n gemengde skool geword het, is op 'n ander terrein in Noorder-Paarl geleë . Die mooiste onlangse prestasie van dié skool met sy kleurryke geskiedenis is sekerlik die sestien leerlinge wat verlede jaar elk 'n A-gemiddelde in die Matriek-eindeksamen behaal het. Die rugbyspeler Schalk Burger, wat dalk vanjaar die WP se nuwe kaptein kan wees, was hier 'n leerling, sowel as die flank klein Schalk Burger. Nog bekendes wat hier leerlinge was, is mnr. Jan Pickard, voorsitter van die WP se Rugby-unie en adv. D.P. de Villiers. HJS Tien jaar ná die stigting van Gimnasium het mnre. W.H. Auret en J.S. Marais die voortou geneem om 'n ``eersteklas''- publieke skool in die Paarl opgerig te kry. 'n Eersteklas-skool was een wat vir 'n primêre en sekondêre kurses in een skoolgebou voorsiening gemaak het. Die Hoër Jongenskool Paarl, of Boys High soos dit ook bekend is, het so in 1868 in 'n pakhuis op Zeederbergplein ontstaan. Dit is gedoop Paarl First Class Public School en die eerste hoof was 'n eerw. Jeffreys, wat deur mnr. Josias Hoffman, later 'n geneesheer in die Paarl, opgevolg is. Aanvanklik het dinge moeilik gegaan en is 'n samesmelting met Gimnasium geprobeer, maar die voertaalkwessie het dit laat misluk. Die skool het teen 1876 net 70 leerlinge gehad, met verskeie knap onderwysers soos eerw. Thomas Walker van Edenburgh. Op 22 Oktober 1877 is besluit dat die seunskool, sowel as dié vir dogters, voortaan as die Paarlse Opvoedingsinstituut bekend sou staan en dat al die eiendom oorgeplaas sou word na die NG Kerk die Paarl, wat as trustee sou optree. Kort voor die einde van die eeu is die skool se naam in Jongens Hoogere School verander. Onder die leiding van mnr. P.J. du prê le Roux (1901-1924) het die HJS 'n baie geslaagde veldtog begin om seuns van die binneland te lok en verskeie koshuise is in gebruik geneem. Daar is op hierdie fondament voortgebou sodat die skool se prestasies op akademiese, kulturele en sportgebied vandag nog dien om seuns uit alle dele van die land na die Paarl te lok. Van die bekende Suid-Afrikaners wat hier leerlinge was, is mnr. Jim Fouché, gewese Staatspresident, oud-ministers Owen Horwood, Schalk van der Merwe en Fanie Botha, prof. Sonny du Plessis, 'n voormalige rektor van die Universiteit van die Witwatersrand, David Frost, die gholfspeler, die rugbyspelers Carel du Plessis, Mannetjies Roux, Boy Louw en Chum Ochse (wat hier onderwys gegee het), mnr. Christo Wiese van Pep Stores en die politikus Japie Basson. Dan was die skrywers Eugène Marais en Karel Schoeman ook leerlinge, asook die TV-akteurs Ernst Eloff en Hennie Smit. Twee skoolhoofde, mnre. P.S. Meyer en Hugo Lambrechts, het albei Direkteur van Onderwys geword en mnr. Toets Fourie, wat verlede jaar as Direkteur van Onderwys afgetree het, was hier 'n onderwyser. LA ROCHELLE Die Hoër Meisieskool La Rochelle het ontwikkel uit 'n private skool wat in 1865 deur ene mev. Hugo gevestig is op die plek waar die Laerskool La Rochelle vandag is. In 1876 het die kerkraad van die gemeente Noorder-Paarl voldoen aan mnr. J. (Jan Orrelis) de Villiers se versoek om dit in 'n ``ladies seminary'' om te skep. Die kerkraad sou ook ondersteuning verleen aan behoeftige lidmate om hul dogters van 'n goeie opvoeding te voorsien. Dit is vandag een van die bekende meisieskole in die land en heelparty bekende vroue was hier leerlinge. Van hulle is mev. Tini Vorster, vrou van oud-premier John Vorster, Anne Mackenzie, Springbok-atleet, Sigrid Walters, junior atletiek-kampioen, Ester Lategan, onafhanklike kandidaat vir Stellenbosch in die Volksraadsverkiesing, mej. J.J Meyer, wat van 1921 tot 1947 hoof van die skool was en vandag 93 jaar oud is, Hettie Smuts, skryfster van 'n boek oor blommerangskikkings, mev. Kosie Uys, wat twee boeke oor borduurwerk geskryf het, die skryfster Alba Bouwer en Elsa Joubert. 'n Aantal TV-persoonlikhede soos Linda de Koning, Joey de Koker, June Seymour en Gretchen Holzapfel was ook leerlinge hier. In 1964 is 'n leerling, Mary Harrison, uit die hele land gekies om na die 300-jarige Shakespeare-fees in Engeland te gaan. Die skool het ook al vir heelparty uitblinkers op akademiese gebied gesorg. MEISIESKOOL Ene mej. Barker, dogter van eerw. George Barker van die Londense Sendinggenootskap, het omstreeks dieselfde tyd begin om onderrig aan meisies met Engels as voertaal te gee. Die leerlingtal het sodanig toegeneem dat 'n meisieskool in 1867 gestig is in die gebou wat sy gebruik het. Die skool is vandag bekend as die Hoër Meisieskool Paarl. Op akademiese gebied het die skool ook gepresteer, met Christine Basson, wat in 1959 en Susie Retief in 1917 eerste gekom het in die Matriek-eindeksamen in Kaapland. Bekendes wat hier leerlinge was, is die skryfster van godsdiensboeke vir kinders, Annieria Theunissen, Cynthia Horwood, suster van oud-min. Horwood en Mabel Jansen, vrou van die laaste goewerneur-generaal van Suid-Afrika. OKP In 1913 het die destydse superintendent-generaal van onderwys besluit om 'n opleidingsentrum vir onderwysers in die paarl op te rig. Die sentrum is amptelik in 1917 geopen en sy status is in 1927 verhoog na die opleidingskollege. Die Onderwyserskollege Paarl, beter bekend as OKP, het so ontstaan. HANDELSKOOL Die Hoër Handelskool Paarl het sy ontstaan te danke aan mense wat die behoefte besef het van die plattelandse kinders wat die skool vroeg reeds moes verlaat om 'n heenkome in 'n stedelike omgewing te vind. Aanvanklik was aandklasse die enigste uitweg. Die Helpmekaarvereniging het die grondslag vir die skool in 1929 gelê. Vandag is daar sewe hoër skole, wat die Hoër Landbouskool en die Hoërskool H.S. van der Walt insluit, en tien laer skole, asook die pre-primêre hospitaalskool.

Monday, 19 December 2011

Treinryers was 'vijan den van Christendom'


FOTO: S/W HET VERSKYN IS daar iemand wat nie die afdrukke van die ``Breë en die Smalle Weg'' ken nie? Dié ``boerekitsch'', soos W.A. de Klerk dit noem, beeld die steil, moeilike, smal pad na die Paradys uit, en langsaan, die breë, lekker pad na die Verdoemenis. ``Die smal weg is deksels oninteressant,'' sê prof. Bun Booyens. Daar is onder meer 'n weeshuis, 'n Sondagskool, 'n hospitaal en 'n kerk. Tussen die twee paaie is 'n diep afgrond met bruggies. Heelparty mense stap van die oninteressante, smal weg na die breë oor. Dít is 'n lekker pad. Daar is wyn- en dobbeltafels, 'n ``ontughuis'', 'n danssaal, 'n bank van lening (om geld te skuld is mos sonde). Daar is selfs 'n dief wat 'n man se geld uit sy agtersak steel. By die Hel se poort staan, van alle dinge, 'n trein, net voordat die breë pad die Verdoemenis ingaan. Hier slaan 'n duiwel plesierig bollemakiesie. Die oudste Breë en Smal Weg-afdrukke was in Hollands. Later het dit Afrikaans geword, sê prof. Booyens. Die trein verskyn net op die latere Afrikaanse afdrukke. Daardie trein by die Hel se poort het sy oorsprong in die Paarl gehad, nogal by 'n predikant. En baie Paarliete het saam met hul leraar geglo treine is werktuie van die Antichris. Die lokomotief is selfs ``de duivels kruijwagen'' genoem! Dit het by ds. Gottlieb Antony van der Lingen begin. Hy was 'n merkwaardige, geleerde man met 'n sterk persoonlikheid en sterk oordele en vooroordele. Hy het diep spore in die kerk en die Paarl getrap. Die Pinksterdienste het by hom begin en hy was die stigter van die Paarlse Gimnasium. Maar hy het ook eienaardige metodes gevolg om werktuie van die sonde te beveg. Treine wat op Sondae loop, was een hiervan. STEEN DES AANSTOOTS In 1862 was die treinspoor van die Kaap na Wellington in aanbou. Dit was reeds tot by die D'Urbanweg-stasie (vandag Bellville-stasie aan die onderent van Durbanweg) voltooi en die trein het tot hier geloop. Aan die oorblywende deel oor Eersterivier, Stellenbosch en die Paarl tot by Wellington is druk gewoel en gewerk. Die trein het vanselfsprekend ook op Sondae geloop, en dít was 'n steen des aanstoots. Hierdie bose verskynsel het heftige reaksies uitgelok van die Calvinistiese kerkvaders op Stellenbosch én die Paarl. Die Paarlse leraar, ds. Van der Lingen, was die groot aanstigter. Voor die koms van die treinspoor het mense selde die stoep verlaat. Nou het almal trein gery. En watter dag leen hom die beste hiervoor as Sondag? Ds. Van der Lingen het die trein as 'n ontsettende bedreiging vir die rusdag gesien. Hy het 'n groot boikotaksie teen die treindiens aan die gang gesit. Totdat alle Sondagtreine afgeskaf is, moet niemand treinry nie, het hy gesê. Op Stellenbosch is gevra dat gemeentelede moet bid vir die verwydering van die Sondagtreine. In die Paarl, onder leiding van die leraar, is 'n verbondskrif (dit is 'n ``pledge'' genoem) gedateer 22 April 1862 rondgestuur waarin ondertekenaars onderneem om ``van nu af geen gebruik, hoe ook genaamd, zoo min op werkdagen als op Zondagen, zoo min voor onze goederen als voor onze personen, te zullen maken van dat vervoermiddel''. Nogtans het die meeste Paarliete verkies om trein te ry, al was dit net van Bellville na die Kaap. Prof. Hofmeyr van Stellenbosch het op 'n vergadering op Wellington gesê dat ``slechts zeer weinigen gewillig zijn de gemakken en voordeelen op te offeren die de spoorweg aanbiedt. De meesten, verreweg, verlaten de bus bij de spoorwegstatie aan den twaalfden mijlsteen (D'Urbanweg)''. Dit was Bellville. HOM TE BUITE GEGAAN Paarliete het dus met die perdebus (hulle het dit 'n omnibus genoem) tot in Bellville gery. Hier is oorgestap om verder per trein tot in die Kaap te ry. Op 16 Mei 1862 is 'n vergadering in die Paarl gehou waar ds. Van der Lingen hom heeltemal te buite gegaan het. Volgens Het Volksblad ``verloor hij alle gematigdheid zoowel wat den geest als de bewoordingen zijner rede betrof''. Hy noem die treinryers ``vijanden van het Christendom'' en ``verraders''. Hy het gepreek dat die Sondagtreine net nog 'n bewys is dat die profesieë oor die verval in die laaste dae en die komende beproewinge vir die kerk besig is om in vervulling te gaan. Daar is selfs beweer dat hy sou gesê het dat diegene wat met die trein ry, al is dit net op weekdae, reeds die teken van die dier op die voorkop het. Hy het die treindiens ``de gruwel dezer eeuw'' genoem. Het Volksblad skryf verder dat sy uitsprake ``aan het godslasterlijke grensden'' en ``zoo grof waren dat het smartelijk is dat een Christen leeraar zoo van anderen spreken kan. . .'' Nogtans, ``door den verbazenden invloed van dezen (die leraar) werd Paarl de wakkerste bestrijdster van de Zondagtreinen.'' Pogings is aangewend om die eienaars van die busdiens van die Paarl na Kaapstad daarvan te laat afsien om D'Urbanweg aan te doen. Hierin is nie geslaag nie. Onder aanstigting van ds. Van der Lingen het die Paarlse ``pledge''-ondertekenaars hul eie busdiens gestig, die Paarlsche Omnibus Maatschappij. Onenigheid in die direksie van die ou, bestaande busdiens het tot sy ontbinding gelei. Die Spoorweë het dadelik sy eie busdiens tussen die Paarl en ``D'Urbanweg'' ingestel. Ds. Van der Lingen en sy elf mededirekteure se ``omnibusdiens'' was die spot van die nie-boikotters. Dit is die ``pontificale bus'' genoem. Daagliks (behalwe Sondae!) het die omnibus om 7 vm. van die Paarl vertrek en minder as ses uur later op die Kaapse parade aangekom. Op Hardekraaltjie is perde omgeruil. Van die stad af het 'n ander omnibus sy reis na die Paarl begin. HAAR SONDE BELY Deur die ``pontificale bus'' kon aan die ``pledge'' praktiese uitvoereing gegee word. Sowat 250 boere en handelaars het hulself verbind om nie die spoorwegmaatskappy se bus- en treindiens te gebruik nie. Die ``Kaapsche weg'' was vol waens wat wyn en ander produkte vervoer het. Volgens Het Volksblad van 11 September 1862 het heelwat mense wat nogal naby aan die ``paus'' staan, die ``pledge'' verbreek. Een van die ``opgewekten'' wat die ``malle railway pledge'' onderteken en toe tog trein gery het, sou by die biduur haar sonde bely het. Daar is selfs gesê dat die ``paus'' se eie skoonseun trein gery het! Ernstige verdeeldheid het in die Paarl geheers. Die ``dolle onderneming'', soos dit genoem is, die ``pontificale busmaatschappij'', het verliese gely. Direkteure, insluitende die predikant, het baie geld gestort om dit aan die gang te hou. Maar die boikotbeweging het ook die Sondagtreine verliese laat ly. 'n Jaar nadat die trein tussen Kaapstad en Eersterivier begin loop het, is die Sondagtreine afgeskaf. Die nuus is met vreugde in die Paarl ontvang. Het Volksblad skryf: Zij roepen nu hiep, hiep, hiep, hoera, wij hebben het overwonnen.'' 'n Dankdiens is gehou. Ds. Van der Lingen het gesê dit is ``zoo aandoenlijk, zoo plegtig, zoo heerlik''. Die Paarliete kon nou weer van die ``ijzeren paard'' gebruik maak. Op 18 Maart 1863, drie dae nadat die Sondagtreine afgeskaf is, is die spoorweg na die Paarl feestelik geopen. Meer as 5 000 mense het dit bygewoon, in hul Sondagklere uitgedos. Ook ``de groote wagen van den Eerw. Heer van der lingen, met talrijke huisgenooten, de panaten der pastorie en zijne schoonzoons gevuld, was bijzonder zogtbaar in die menigte van rijtuigen'', berig Het Volksblad. Die ``pontificale omnimusdiens'' kon nou afgeskaf word. 'n Vendusie is gehou waarop onder meer twee omnibusse, 36 trekperde, bybehore, en 'n trompet(!) opgeveil is. HEWIGE VERKOUE Twee jaar ná die afskaffing van Sondagtreine het sewehonderd inwoners van Kaapstad, Mowbray en Rondebosch die spoorwegmaatskappy versoek om 'n Sondagtreindiens op die nuwe spoorlyn tussen Kaapstad en Wynberg in te stel. Hulle het gesê dit sou kerkgangers die geleentheid gee om dienste in die stad by te woon. Aan die versoek is voldoen. Sondagtreine het gekom om te bly. Daar was weer proteste, maar ds. Van der Lingen was nou stil. Of hy ooit trein gery het? Inderdaad. In 1866 het hy gedurende 'n treinrit na Stellenbosch so 'n hewige verkoue opgedoen dat hy nie die ringsitting kon bywoon nie. In sy doktorale proefskrif Gottlieb Antony van der Lingen, Kaapse predikant uit die negentiende eeu, waaruit die stof vir hierdie artikel gehaal is, skryf dr. M.C. Kitshoff dat ds. Van der Lingen dit nie as verkeerd beskou het om in Europa die spoorweg te gebruik nie, maar hy het die gebruik daarvan in Suid-Afrika as sonde aangemerk. Hoewel hy die trein 'n instrument van die duiwel en die gruwel van die eeu genoem het, het hy later self trein gery. Miskien het hy ontdek dat dit nie altyd so maklik is om die grens tussen die breë en die smal weg te onderskei nie.

Photo taken at Paarl Museum July 2009 

Paarl Museum Old Dutch Reformed Church Parsonage



Paarl Museum is situated in the old parsonage of the Strooidak Church  "Our collections are displayed in a Cape-Dutch home with a U shaped floor plan dating from the 18 century. The museum is situated on farm that was allocated in 1699 by Governor Willem Adriaan van der Stel to Pieter Janz van Marseveen. The present building has over the years been used as a parsonage for the Strooidak Church, a home for the Thom family and a boys hostel for Paarl Gimnasium High School. In 1939 the building was restored and fitted out as a museum." Paarl Museum information pamphlet 2009
MINISTERS OF THIS PARSONAGE
Eleven ministers from the Strooidak Congregation lived in the original and present building (Paarl Museum). They were as follow:

Rev. Petrus van Aken
(1715 - 1724)
Rev. Lambertus Slicher
(1725 - 1730)
Rev. W. van Hertzogenraedt
(1731 - 1736)
Rev. Salomon van Echten
(1738 - 1753)
Rev. Petrus van der Spuy
(1753 - 1781)
Rev. Robert N. Aling
(1784 - 1800)
Rev. Petrus van der Spuy (Nephew of the former Rev. van der Spuy)
(1806 - 1807)
Rev. J.G.L. Gebhart
(1810 - 1823)
Rev. T.J. Herold (He let the parsonage while lived at Simonsvlei farm)
(1823 - 1831)
Rev. G.W.A. van der Lingen
(1831 - 1869)
Rev. Gilles van de Wall
(1870 - 1872)


One of the ministers was Rev. Petrus van der Spuy (1753 - 1781), who was the first South African born minister. The renowned Rev. G.W.A. van der Lingen played a fundamental role in the cultural as well as the educational development of Paarl.
[photo]
The museum contains various items that belonged to Rev. van der Lingen such as his bookcase modelled after the Bible's description of King Solomon's Temple and is about seven feet high. The bookcase was the gift from the congregation upon his completion of 25 years of service. Some additional items such as his Psalm book and personal items of furniture are also contained within the museum.

Friday, 16 December 2011

The Children's Friend Society, Early Child Migrants

http://www.britishhomechildren.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=100:the-childrens-friend-society-early-child-migrants&catid=16:bhc-history&Itemid=2



Written by Norah Dennis    
Thursday, 25 October 2007 02:44 
This wonderful information was posted in the South Africa Immigration Mailing List on Rootsweb.  I place it here retaining copyright to the original poster, R. Wat -- rowwat@hotmail.com.

In 1840 a report was made for the House of Commons by the Governor of the Cape on the Condition and Treatment of the Children sent out by the Childrens Friend Society. During the preparation of the report the children were interviewed, as were their masters. Included in the report are the childrens, masters and magistrates comments. (The magistrates were responsible for gathering the information) I have noted below the details of the children included in the report. A copy of the full report can be viewed at the National Archives, Kew reference CO 48/207.

The investigations were conducted by Majors LONGMORE, PIERS, BARNES and Captain HILL. At the time of the report there were 434 apprentices under 232 masters. (359 were males and 75 females.) One concern addressed by the report was whether the children had become a replacement after the abolition of slavery in 1838, especially as a number were carrying out tasks such as herding which was usually reserved for the coloured population. The report concluded that only one such complaint was made, but was frivolous. The comment was that the abolition may have been beneficial to the children as their conditions had improved since the abolition. Another concern was that many children were not learning a trade, so would be unable to sufficiently support themselves after their apprentice.

The report seems to have been instigated due to the supposed treatment of Mr  Gerrit H. DE WETs treatment of his apprentices notably TRUBSHAW (who had been sent from England due to theft and had deserted his master.) A visit to his farm had found his apprentices happy and no reason for concern could be seen.

Children interviewed or commented in report:



George PLATT:
About 16 years old. Parents are dead. Can read & write. Corresponds with elder brother in England. Attends church every Sunday, but receives no education. Receives sufficient food and clothes. Employed digging in vineyard and herding cattle. Wishes to return to England as learning no skills other than that of a farm labourer. Master Reverend G W A Vander LINGEN, Paarl had no complaints of child. George is healthy and well grown.

Die Genootskap van Regte Afrikaners


AGTERGRONDARTIKEL

Die Genootskap van Regte Afrikaners

Deur Amanda Kreitzer



DIE regstreekse oorsaak van die stigting van die Genootskap van Regte Afrikaners was te danke aan een man, Arnoldus Pannevis -- taalkenner, leermeester, primêre grondlegger van Afrikaans as kultuurtaal. Profeet van buite wat aan die Afrikaner in sy stomheid 'n geestelike tong wou gee.
 
Op 'n onverklaarbare wyse het hy hom diep aangetrokke gevoel tot Suid-Afrika en sy Hollandssprekende bevolking. Hier aangekom, kon hy onmiddellik raaksien wat die Afrikaners in daardie stadium nog net nie te mooi van geweet het nie. Díe taal, so maklik op die oor, besluit hy, het feitlik al die sier van sewentiende-eeuse Nederlands waaruit dit gekom het, afgeskud. Sy siening, gerugsteun deur intelligente geesdrif, het hy gou oorgedra aan individue in 'n gemeenskap waarin hy hom meer as tuis gevoel het: díe van Drakenstein, veral Dal Josafat. Hy het by sy vriend, ds. GWA van der Lingen, tuisgegaan. Daar in die studeerkamer met sy baie boeke moes hierdie twee, albei met hulle eie Nederlandse erfenis, lang ure gesels het oor hierdie vreemdste en verste van die Dietse tale.
 
Dit was tydens Pannevis se onderrigjare aan die Gimnasium dat hy die jong boereseun SJ du Toit uit Dal Josafat as iemand met uitsonderlike begaafdheid herken het. Du Toit se lesse by Pannevis ter voorbereiding vir Teologiese Kweekskool was 'n beslissende oomblik vir sy lewe en sienswyse. En die dag toe hierdie vurige en geniale kop die argumente en gesonde taalinsigte van Pannevis vat en in sy hart opneem, was dit die begin van die Eerste Afrikaanse Taalbeweging. Van Arnoldus Pannevis het SJ du Toit self later getuig: "En hier kan ons nie nalaat om 'n man te noem wat werklik die eerste met erns die gedagte uitgespreek en ons o'ertuig het, dat ons 'n eie taal het, en wel 'n voortreklike taal, wat ons moet erken en beoefen. Die man is oþerlede mnr. Pannevis, molik die grootste taalgeleerde wat ons ooit in ons land hat."
 
Nêrens blyk Pannevis se intelligente, ewewigtige siening van die saak van die Afrikaanse taal so duidelik nie soos in sy ekende bydrae tot Die Patriot in 1882: Gesprek over het Kaaps- Hollands;
 
"Oom" en "Neef" voer 'n debat. "Neef" is gretig maar huiwerig. "Oom" se argumente is egter so rustig oortuigend dat "Neef" gaandeweg sy onsekerheid in vreugde voel verander... vreugde by die ontdekking van 'n bate waarvan hy nie bewus was nie. þNeefþ leer ook van "Oom" (Arnoldus Pannevis) dat Afrikaans sy eintlike beslag gekry het toe die Hollandse gesag in Afrika opgehou het, toe die spreektaal van die Kaapse bevolking, blank en bruin, te staan gekom het voor die oorheersende feit van die wêreldtaal, Engels. Wat die hele saak vir "Neef" beklink, is "Oom" se versekering: "Een naauwgezette studie en beoefening onzer taal zal http://www.roepstem.net/patriot.htmlhaar eigenaardige kracht en biezondere schoonheid aan het daglicht brengen, en men zal zich nog eendag over dat verachte Afrikaans verwonderen..."
 
Waar tevore het ooit so iets plaasgevind? Dat 'n immigrant 'n nuwe land betree, en plotseling iets van oorheersende belang in die kultuurbesit raaksien op 'n wyse wat die inheemse bevolking nog die heeltyd onwyk het? En dit teen die agtergrond van 'n Engelsman, -Lord Charles Somerst, se besieling met die idee van 'n "Empire". Dit was Engels in die howe, Engels in die skole, verkieslik ook Engels in die kerk.
 
Stel jou voor: mense met 'n eie spreektaal wat hulle nie eens kon lees of skryf nie. Want daar is niks om te lees, en hulle het ook nie eens die woorde, die taalmeganiek waarmee hulle kon skryf nie. Hulle staan met 'n stukkie van 'n taal wat swaar dra aan die dooie hand van die VOC-verlede, opnuut verkneg deur 'n nog vreemder idioom -- 'n doofstom volk.
 
Arnoldus Pannevis sien dit raak met die vars blik van 'n fyn, onafhanklike gees van buite. In 'n privaat brief op 7 November 1874 aan die Britse en Buitelandse Bybelgenootskap (BBBG) in London, pleit hy dat hul die Bybel in Afrikaans moet vertaal en uitgee. Dit moes gedoen word met die oog op die Blankes en Kleurlinge wat dit beter sou begryp in Afrikaans as in Hollands of Engels. Hy doen dan ook iemand aan die hand wat volgens hom uitmuntend bevoeg sou wees om so 'n vertaling te onderneem te wete SJ du Toit. Die BBBG verwys die brief na hul plaaslike verteenwoordiger in die Kaap, ds. George Morgan. Ds. Morgan skakel toe met SJ du Toit maar hy wou eers die saak met 'n paar voorstaanders van Afrikaans bespreek alvorens hy antwoord gee. So word 'n byeenkoms gereel vir Saterdag 14 Augustus 1875 in Gideon Malherbe se huis in Pastorielaan Paarl.
 
Die vergadering is deur die volgende agt persone bygewoon in volgorde van ouderdom: Gideon Malherbe, CP Hoogenhout, DF du toit (bynaam "Dokter"), DF du Toit (oom Lokomotief), sy broer SJ du Toit, August Ahrbeck en Petrus Malherbe en SG du Toit. JPJ Dempers, 'n godsdiensonderwyser van Wellington is ook verwag, maar hy het nie opgedaag nie. Almal behalwe Hoogenhout en Arbeck was familie. Maar die agt jollie kêrels het nie net vir 'n geselsie bymekaargekom nie; hulle het formeel vergadering gehou. Hulle noem dit "een voorlopige vergadering van Afrikaanders". Bybelvertaling is bespreek, maar die kar kon tog nie voor die donkies ingespan word nie. Die taal moes eers 'n vaste skryfvorm kry. 'n Kommissie word dus benoem en Die Genootskap se konstitusie ("naam en reþels") sou ogestel en by 'n volgende vergadering voorgelê word.
 
Vyf maande nadat hulle die eerste keer vergader het, verskyn Die Patriot waarin "ieder Regte Afrikaander" (met Afrikaanse en nie Hollandse of Engelse harte nie) opgeroep word "om te staan ver ons Taal, ons Nasie en ons Land".
 
Met reg kan gesê word dat die hele heroiese era van die Afrikanervolk deur die enkelvoudige taalaanvoeling van 'n beskeie maar diep sensitiewe mens in sy spesifieke koers en vorm geplaas is: Arnoldus Pannevis. En net so onopgemerk as wat hy gekom het is hy weer weg. Nadat hy by die Gimnasium bedank, gaan bly hy op Dal Josafat en gee daar onderwys aan 'n privaat skooltjie wat die "Gedenkschool der Hugenoten" sou word, opgerig deur die Genootskappers as 'n "lewende monument", om die twee eeue van hulle Hugenoteskap in Suid-Afrika te onthou. Sy gesondheid was altoos swak en ten tye van sy dood op die betreklike jong ouderdom van 46 het hy by WP du Plessis op die plaas Groenrivier, in Wellington gewoon.
 
Vir hierdie taalbesieldes het dit gegaan oor lewenstyl, wat onafhanklikheid van gees is. 'n Bloedlyn wat ver terug loop in die verlede, van 'n lang geskiedenis van verset teen dwingelandy. Na GWA van der Lingen, Estienne Barbier, die Franse vlugtelinge en hul Vryburgergeesgenote, die slag van Majuba wat ses jaar na die stigting van die GRA plaasvind, bereik dit sy hoogtepunt met die uitbreek van die Tweede Vryheidsoorlog. Dit het gegaan oor die 2waarde van 'n vry mens wat op sy eie voete loop en tegelyk sy nederigheid voor sy Skepper en sy eie waarde as skepsel herontdek en daarop aandring.
 
Dis karakter, -idioom van 'n besondere skeppende persoonlikheid. Dit is die betekenis van die kunstenaar of kultuurleier, om die ontwikkeling van die volk te lei deur te bepaal wat waardervol en sterk is en hom te laat lei deur sy geloof in die suiwere, en sy liefde vir die skone.
 
Wanneer ons ons taalhelde eer, eer ons die geestelike dinge wat juis aan die stoflike dieper betekenis en sin gee. 'n Volk se waarde word daarom nie geskat op grond van aardse besittings of magsprestige nie, maar word gemeet aan die waarde van sy letterkunde, musiek, beeldende kunste en sy waardering vir wat goed, mooi en ewig in die alledaagse lewe is. Die aansien wat Afrikaanse taal- en letterkunde in 'n eeu verwerf het, is 'n geringe tydperk in vergeleke met die letterkundige ontwikkeling van groot kultuurvolke.
 
Die Latynse skrywer Seneca het gese: "Die mens word groter na mate hy sy doel hoër stel". Mag daar in 'n tyd waar lewenstyl in die vergetelheid van middelmatigheid verdwyn het, die stryd weer aangesê word deur die volk wat Afrikaans as sy erfenis verkry het, teen die hol, vlak en onbeskaamde woord wat nie meer verhef of inspireer nie, maar soos 'n bril is wat met wasem beslaan is.

http://www.roepstem.net/patriot.html

Ds. S.J du Toit

Saturday, 10 December 2011

Gymnasium Primary School

http://www.kontrei.co.za/paarl-walkabout.php


On 5 July 1831 the Rev Gottlieb Wilhelm Antonie van der Lingen was confirmed as minister in Paarl. After it was finally decided in 1857 to establish the Theological Seminary in Stellenbosch, the Reverend decided in 1857 to found a church school where boys could be prepared for the Theological Seminary or for further study in Europe. Instruction was to be in Dutch. On 12 January 1858 the school was opened. The Egyptian-style architecture and decorations were intended to be symbolic. One of the appointed teachers was Arnoldis Pannevis, who arrived in South Africa from Holland in 1866 and played an important part in the First Language Monument. After the founding of the Noorder-Paarl congregation in 1875, with the Rev SJ du Toit as minister, church services of the new congregation were held in the Gymnasium. The left wing of the school was used as parsonage. Gymnasium produced several well-known South Africans, amongst them the first professor of Afrikaans in South Africa, Prof DF Malherbe, who taught at the University College of the OFS, and Prof JJ Smith, the first professor in Afrikaans at the University of Stellenbosch. The Gymnasium was declared a national monument in 1968 and still serves as a school.



Arnoldus Pannevis – Champion of Afrikaans

http://ancestry24.com/arnoldus-pannevis/



Arnoldus Pannevis was born at Oudekerk aan de Ijssel, Netherlands on 16th February 1838 and died at Paarl on the 14th August 1884. He was a school-master and champion of Afrikaans and came from a leading burgher family. His father and his grandfather had been doctors, and he, too, studied medicine at Utrecht for some years. On 1.8.1859 he became a medical officer in the Dutch navy, but because of poor health he was honourably discharged on 31.10.1861. He studied literature under the most accomplished men of his time, among them being Dr J. W. G. van Oordt, who subsequently came to Cape Town. P. acquired a sound knowledge of Greek and Latin, mastered French, German and English, and also had some knowledge of Spanish. He sat for his degree on 13.1.1864.

You can also find out more about the Afrikaanse Taalbeweging at Myfundi

Political developments in Trans-Orangia from 1848 to 1854, when the Orange Free State was established, had fired Pannevis’s imagination, and as a schoolboy he had been eager to visit South Africa. His wish was fulfilled when he arrived in Cape Town on the mail ship on 11.7.1866. He stayed at Du Toit’s boarding-house in Strand Street and it was here that, dining with Afrikanders, he noticed that in South Africa a language very different from Dutch had developed. Because of his linguistic training, Pannevis realized at once that he had encountered a new language. This discovery was to be of great importance to the history of Afrikaans, for P. was to do much to achieve the recognition of Afrikaans both as a written and as a Biblical language.

He went to Paarl where he met the Rev. G. W. A. van der Lingen. As they had many interests in common, they soon became firm friends, and P. later accepted a post as a classics master at the Paarl Gymnasium, established by Van der Lingen in 1859. On one of his pupils in particular, later the Rev. S. J. du Toit, Pannevis had a profound influence, opening his eyes to the claim Afrikaans had to recognition as a language in its own right. Du Toit later said that his teacher may have been the greatest philologist South Africa had produced (J. D. du Toit, infra).

In private conversation, in public and in the press he strove tirelessly to convince others of the value of Afrikaans as a written language. A profoundly religious man, he was concerned about those (particularly the Coloureds) who could understand neither the Dutch nor the English Bible. The solution he proposed was to translate it into Afrikaans. For this reason he wrote a letter ‘De Bijbel in het Afrikaans’ in De Zuid-Afrikaan of 7.9.1872, advocating an Afrikaans translation for the sake of the Coloureds.

This letter evoked considerable discussion in the press in Dutch, but the idea of a translation was unanimously rejected as rash and unnecessary; Afrikaans was, as yet, no more than kitchen Dutch (plat-Hollands), it was contended, and the sublimity of God’s Word could not be slighted by translation into such a dialect.
P. himself, in an article in De Hollandsche Afrikaan (22.8.1883), called the date on which his letter had appeared in De Zuid-Afrikaan the day on which the Eerste Afrikaanse Taalbeweging (‘First Afrikaans language movement’) was born. ‘The affair,’ he wrote, ‘attracted much interest, and soon there were many champions of Afrikaans …  A powerful chord had been struck, and its vibrations slowly filled the country. Gradually the Taalbeweging penetrated the entire nation’.

Meanwhile C. P. Hoogenhout and the Rev. S. J. du Toit also discussed in De Zuid-Afrikaan a translation of the Bible and Afrikaans as a separate language, and gave considerable impetus to the movement in favour of Afrikaans. But Arnoldus was the first to think of an association for the promotion of Afrikaans. Under the pseudonym ‘O.’ he wrote an article in De Zuid-Afrikaan of 4.11.1874: ‘Is die Afferkaans wesenlijk een taal?’ Maintaining that Afrikaans was a language in its own right, he advocated its recognition. The fluidity of its spelling was hardly an obstacle. Once it had been established, a society for the advancement of Afrikaans could immediately publish a grammar and a dictionary. In these two books it would be evident that Afrikaans was an independent language, which anyone, even an Englishman, might speak.

Three days after the appearance of this article, Pannevis wrote to the British and Foreign Bible society, asking it to have the Bible translated into Afrikaans. This letter was to result in the establishment, on 14.8.1875, of the Genootskap van Regte Afrikaners (G.R.A.). Unfortunately he called Afrikaans ‘a kind of corrupted Dutch’ in his letter, and in its reply the association refused to perpetuate a pidgin language through a translation of the Bible.

Arnoldus was too idealistic to become a great leader of his crusade. His pupil, the Rev. S. J. du Toit, took charge. He suffered from a nervous complaint, and it seems as if his instability and fanaticism led to his being overshadowed by G.R.A. members who were alarmed by his impetuosity.

The foundation meeting of the G.R.A. decided that a translation of the Bible would be premature. They considered P. too hasty: first the nation had to be brought to realize that it had a language of its own, to respect its language, and then the demand for an Afrikaans Bible would follow naturally.

Arnoldus did not join the G.R.A. until its third meeting, although the Taalbeweging was a direct result of his letter to the British and Foreign Bible society. Not only did he gain supporters for Afrikaans; he also persuaded them to write and, as a society, to pursue their aims and convince Afrikanders that they did, in fact, have a language of their own. In this sense Pannevis can rightly be called the father of the Afrikaanse Taalbeweging.
He also strove for the preservation of Dutch culture. He wrote articles and letters to news-papers and periodicals. Very soon after his arrival he noticed that the country was threatened by British influences. In a letter to Het Volksblad (30.4.1870) he was particularly passionate in his condemnation of English church services in the N.G. Kerk, as this did much to advance anglicization. Pannevis made the hostility of many ministers towards Afrikaans the butt of a humorous article in Die Afrikaanse Patriot (17.12.1880). In an unpublished essay on school education he strongly criticized the way English history was being taught to Afrikaans children. In an article called ‘Mr., Miss, Mrs.’ (Die Afrikaanse Patriot, February 1883) he sharply attacked Afrikanders who spoke English. Condemning the British annexation of the Transvaal, he wrote ‘t Misdadig Engeland: tot troos ver ons landgenote in Transvaal, bij die aanhegting deur die Engelse (Paarl, 1877); only three copies of this book are known to exist. In his ‘Gesprek over het Kaaps-Hollands’ written in 1875 and published in the Patriot in 1882 (cf. J. D. du Toit, infra), he used philological arguments to prove the right to existence of Afrikaans and to refute the contention that Afrikaans was a Hottentot language. This article shows that he  had a clear grasp of philological principles and was far ahead of his times in his ideas on the ‘foreign influences’ on Afrikaans and its origin. ‘Close study and correct use of Afrikaans will reveal its peculiar force and extreme beauty, and one day people will be amazed at this much despised language … The future of South Africa depends on the recognition of Afrikaans’.

Although Pannevis was a strong advocate of Afrikaans, he usually wrote in Dutch, as he did in his regular contributions to Het Zuid-Afrikaansche Tijdschrift. Among the items he left are a large number of essays and poems, almost all written in Dutch. These poems follow the nineteenth-century traditions of pious Dutch poetry. Nor are his Afrikaans poems much more than doggerel. Most of them are of a religious nature, acknowledging guilt and repentance. In almost all of his poems P. is strongly didactic. In his poems on Afrikaans he is astringent and bitter, as in ‘Rasende afgodery’. He translated several French poems into Afrikaans, and was also one of the four authors of Die Afrikaanse Volkslied (”n Ider nasie het syn land’), the first work published by the G.R.A.

He compiled a vocabulary of Afrikaans which he gave to Prof. N. Mansvelt for his Proeve van een Kaapsch-Hollandsch idioticon (1884). The Rev. S. J. du Toit also used this list for his Afrikaanse taalskat’ in Ons Taal.

Arnoldus Pannevis was a bachelor and a Freemason, but later condemned this movement and withdrew from it. On 12.9.1877 he resigned his lectureship at the Paarl Gymnasium, explaining that, because of ill-health, he could not satisfactorily perform the duties which had, through a reorganization of the school, devolved on him. Three days later he resigned his membership of the G.R.A. (in a letter which was read to the association) ‘although my attitude to the Afrikaans cause has not changed in the slightest and, I trust, never shall’. Of this period C. P. Hoogenhout wrote: ‘Soon afterwards his sufferings began. Strained, tense and writing incessantly, he had weakened his nervous system, and often became exceedingly depressed. But, periodically, there would be a respite – when he avoided exertion. That rarely happened, however. He was happiest of all on some quiet farm, where in his last years we saw him teach small children the elements of education, as though that were his true vocation’ (Het Zuid-Afrikaansche Tijdschrift, November 1881).

On 14.8.1884 he died of failure of a cardiac artery at Groenberg, Wellington, and was buried the next day in the family tomb of the Rev. G. W. A. van der Lingen, next to the N.G. Kerk in Paarl.


Grave G.W.A. van der Lingen


Franschhoek - Church Dedicated by the Rev G W A van der Lingen

To the Huguenots their religion and religious practices were of great importance. It was because they could not freely practice their religion that thousands of them fled their country.
Chapel. For a period of 150 years there was only one congregation and church building in the Drakenstein valley. The first church was situated near the present Simondium and was used until 1717. Then a larger church was erected in Paarl and remained in use from 2nd June, 1720 until 25th/28th April, 1805 when the Strooidakkerk (Thatched Roof Church) was completed. Wellington seceded on the 19th June, 1840 followed by Franschhoek on 21st February, 1845 being the 28th congregation of the Dutch Reformed Church in the Cape Colony.
The total community of Franschhoek found it very difficult to attend church services in Paarl. There was a dire need for both a church and a school and in 1833 a chapel was built to fulfil both needs. It was a primitive building without benches or a ceiling and it is not clear to us how the original seating was organised. Men and women sat on opposite sides of the aisle with whites at the front and coloureds at the back.
After the church was built and taken into use in 1847 the chapel became a school and was used as such until August 1899 when a new school building was inaugurated. Afterwards it was used as the first library in the village until 1962 when it was demolished.
Church. The church council made application to the government on 7th June, 1845 for the acquisition of 2 acres of the outspan to be used for the building of a church. Their request for the ground was granted but not that of financial aid.
The building was to be 84 feet in length, 36 feet in width, and 17 feet in height. Collection lists were sent all over the country to assist with the fundraising, and in 1846 the Neo-Gothic type building was erected by Joseph James Turpin. The foundation was of stone while the walls were built of kilnbricks, and the gable is copied from the Episcopal Church in Harrington Street, Cape Town. The turrets, peak-arched windows and doors, and lobateornamentation was, at the time, a very popular style for church buildings. Initially it was a rectangular building without wings. It was dedicated on Sunday 18th April, 1847 by the Rev G W A van der Lingen of Paarl.
The church building soon proved too small, and on 13th September, 1875, plans to enlarge it were discussed by the council. Two wings, one on the north and one on the south side were built on in 1882 and the thatched roof was replaced with corrugated iron. The work was completed on 3rd August, 1883 and gave the church its present-day shape of a Greek cross. When it was restored in 1968, thatch once more replaced the corrugated iron roof.
On 24th November, 1972 the building, bell-tower, ring-wall and all the ground contained therein was declared a National Monument.


Huguenot Memorial Museum :: Farms & Development
http://www.museum.co.za/religion.html

Thursday, 8 December 2011

The Pulpit, Strooidak Church, G.W.A. van der Lingen


Die preekstoel wat tans in gebruik is, is in 1838 deur mej. M.M. Krynauw aan die gemeente geskenk. Dit is van stinkhout gemaak en veral opmerklik is die koperpen waaraan ds. G.W.A. van der Lingen, volgens Nederlandse gebruik, sy steek (driekantige hoed) opgehang het. Die duif wat van die plafon van die preekstoelhang, dien as simbool van die Heilige Gees.
(The pulpit currently in use was donated to the congregation by Miss M.M. Krynauw in 1838. It is made from stinkwood and what is noteworthy is the copper peg on which rev. G.W.A. van der Lingen, according to Dutch use he used tohang his three sided hat on. The dove on the ceiling of the pulpit represents the Holy Spirit.)
Voor die preekstoel staan die voorlesersknapie. Langs die preekstoel hang die “armbeurse” waarmee eers gekollekteer is. Onderaan elke sakkie het ‘n silwerklokkie gehang waarmee slapende aanbidders, vanweë die al te lang preek, vir die kollekte wakker gemaak is.
(In front of the pulpit stands the reading dais. Next to the pulpit hangs the collection purse with which money was collected. Under each purse hangs a silver bell which was used to wake sleeping parishioners especially during long sermons.)

http://www.strooidak.co.za/preekstoel.asp 3/30/2011

"The story of the 1st Battalion Cape Corps, 1915-1919" AA van der Lingen

The following is an extract from "The story of the 1st Battalion Cape Corps, 1915-1919" which gives the chaplain as Rev. A.A. van der Lingen  

Among the names which occur in the lists of officers of the regiment from the earliest times are many which are marked upon colonial history, whilst an interesting feature is the predominantly Scottish element. In 1805-6 the name of H. Lichtenstein, the celebrated explorer, occurs as surgeon, and also in the same period Baron von Boncheuroder. Then under the British command appear the well-known names of Lieut. -Colonel John Graham, Major Cuyler, C. L. Napier, J. Sutherland, the Rev. A. A. van der Lingen (chaplain), W. W. Harding, A. Stockenstroom, J. van Rynevekl, Colonel H. Somerset, H. D.Warden, Bisset, and J. Buchanan, whilst the names of officers commemorated to-day as place names are A. B. Armstrong and \V. Cox (Forts Armstrong and Cox)"

The full article is available at: http://www.archive.org/stream/storyof1stbattal00diffuoft/storyof1stbattal00diffuoft_djvu.txt

Monday, 5 December 2011

A DIFFERENT HISTORY OF FRANSCHOEK and the DRAKENSTEIN DISTRICT (GWA van der Lingen anti-segregationist)

Submitted by Alan Montgomery March 2010
Written by Admin
Monday, 26 July 2010 17:14
The successful wine-farming district of Franschhoek emerged from an old elephant breeding ground first called Olifantshoek, through the combined efforts of French Hugenots, Free Black farmers, slaves, indigene Khoi labourers and later indentured labour from other African countries and amaXhosa labour.
The original name Franche Hoek applied to the broader farmlands of the area settled by French Huguenot refugees. When people first began to break the land, the concentration of dangerous wildlife at this spot saw the name changed from Olifantshoek to Banghoek because of the fearsome reputation of the area.
Franschhoek, the town, has a more recent history, only being proclaimed as such in 1881. At the time its inhabitants were 50% white and 50% coloured. Just how did Franschhoek the dorp become the white town of affluence and ersatz French-styled tourism offerings that it is today? How did the Huguenot contribution drown out all of the other contributors to farming success in the area?

The early peopling of Franschhoek
The San and Khoi moved freely in the area prior to the first VOC scouts entering this terrain. The territory was under the oversight of the Gorachouqua kraal at Klapmutsburg and the Gorachouqua and their territory fell under the direction of the Goringhaiqua who were answerable to the Chainoqua regional chieftainship. The Chainoqua governed the entire Cape territory of European settlement, on behalf of the Hamcumqua King who in turn respected the paramount status of the Chobona. The Chainouqua and Hamcumqua shared camps and practiced intermarriage with the amaXhosa and the Chobona were a mixed Khoi-Xhosa people and Xhosa polity.
While the new settlers were to see the Khoi first as troublesome pests and later as vital labourers whom they enserfed through a slave-type indentured labour system, the Khoi saw the settlers as their guests who ought to be showing them respect. Later the amaXhosa who were a mixed Nguni-Khoisan people, also expected the settler descendants to show respect to their traditional authority. The term Xhosa was a Khoisan name given to the original tiny Nguni southern clan into which many Khoi and San people had assimilated through royal marriages. Under King Tshawe and following his reign, the original small Nguni clan grew into a confederacy of different tribes and clans to become the modern amaXhosa national group. Over 500 years from 1500 this group developed from the initial coming together of Nguni, Khoi and San, to also incorporate Griquas, European and Asian Slaves marooned through shipwrecks, and droster slaves from the Cape Colony who sought refuge. During the latter years hundred years war amaXhosa would have first found their way into the Franschhoek district in significant numbers.
From their perspective the settlers and their descendants considered the land of the Drakenstein to be unpopulated and free for the taking. They could not understand the indigene people whom they considered to be inferior. What existed was a very loose African confederal polity within a plural monarchy that was very different to what the Europeans had in Europe. It was also not protected by a mobile military force of any sort. The settlers just could not get their heads around these loose African systems. The conflicting perspectives of the indigenes and the European settlers and their descendents have continued without resolution for over 350 years.

Simon van der Stel the ‘Eurasian’ Governor who came from Mauritius
Simon van der Stel, arguably the first coloured (Eurasian) Governor of the Cape, was a farming development visionary who simply from a position of strength declared the territory he named as the Drakenstein, to be a VOC possession to be exploited for agricultural purposes. The VOC had largely broken Khoi resistance in the district while mobile armed commandos kept the "troublesome" San hunter groups in check. Van der Stel named the area Groot Drakenstein after visting VOC Commissioner Hendrik van Rheede tot Drakenstein. The area between what became Franschhoek and Stellenbosch, acquired the name Jan de Jonkershoek, so named after combining the name and nickname of two pioneering farmers in the area. One was the Free Black farmer, Jan van Saloor, also known as Jan Lui (Lazy Jan) and the other farmer was Johan Andriesz nicknamed the bachelor  (de Jonker).
Simon van der Stel

Van der Stel initially wanted to settle the Drakenstein with black farmers from Angola or Indians from Bengal as he had little faith in the local Burghers farming abilities in the Cape and had plenty of experience of successful plantations in Mauritius and Batavia. The VOC changed his mind when they sent him a different kind of skilled and hard-working settler in the form of the French Huguenots. The combination of Hugenots, assisted by slave labour, made it possible for Simon van der Stel to develop the Drakenstein. The slaves were brought in from Africa and Madagascar, India and the Indonesian Archipelago. Over time thousands of slaves were locally born to lead lives of slavery and servitude. While initially the VOC had trouble subjugating the Khoi and coercing them into the labour force, after the 1713 smallpox epidemic this change dramatically. From a highly independent Khoi population of up to 200 000 prior to the European colony, the Khoi numbers had been reduced to about 15 000. From the latter half of the second decade of the 1700s, Khoi indentured labour became a vital component of the farming economy.
History neither properly acknowledged nor rewarded the descendents of slaves and the Khoi for their contribution. By 1827 the Stellenbosch district, of which Franschhoek was a part, had a total population of 16 325 of which 8 445 were slaves. In 1692 there were seven registered slave owners in Franschhoek with 43 slaves between them. The back-breaking work that went into taming the land and creating the beautiful farms, vineyards and towns largely relied on slave labour, captured San and coerced Khoi serf labour.

Another pioneer component in the Drakenstein were the Free black farmers and artisans. In 1712 there were 17 Free Blacks in the Stellenbosch district of which Franschhoek was a part. Amongst these were artisan craftsmen such as Isaac van Terenate, Rangton of Bali, Anthonie van Saloor, Jafta van der Caab and Johannes Adriaanse. Free Black farmers included Jan van Saloor, Marquart van Saloor, Anthonie van Angola, Manuel van Angola and his wife Elizabeth van der Caab, and Louis van Bengalen. Other Free Black and mixed families settled along the Eerste River.
Amongst the Huguenot families there also were people of colour. The first owners of the farm Rust en Vrede were the French family Jacques and Marie-Madeleine De Savoyes. Their eldest daughter Margo married Christoffel Snyman the son of the Free Black burgers Anthonie from Bengal and Catharina of Palicatte. The Free Black farmer Christoffel Snyman and his French wife Margo, as Marie then called herself, became the second owners of the farm Zandvliet, today known as Solms-Delta. The first owner Silverbach had also been married to a Free Black woman.
The story does not end here. One of the sons of leading French Hugenots Francois and Cornelia Villion (Viljoen), Henning Viljoen, married Margo Snyman, after Christoffel Snyman the Free Black died. Christoffel and Margo had a "Coloured" daughter Catharina who in one of those twists of circumstances, married her step-father`s brother, Johannes Viljoen. Other Huguenot settlers like the Cordiers had two of their sons marry free slave sisters. The early days at the Cape did not have entrenched segregation. All of these people were amongst the founders of the Coloured and African communities of today. They are also the black ancestors of many white families.
Anna de Koningh a free slave who rose to ownership of Groot Constantia
Amongst the French Hugenots was also one, Jacob Etienne Gauch the son of French parents, but born in Switzerland in 1684 (Celigny). He came to the Cape in 1691 and settled in Franschhoek under the name Steven Gous. In 1718 he married a 13 year old freed slave girl, Catharina Bok. They had 7 children. When the widow Catharina died in 1767 she was able to bequeath her youngest son the farms "Berg en Dal" and "Klipheuwel", plus 12,000 guilders in cash. In the traditional white narratives of Franschhoek the threads of black history is carefully removed from the complex tapestry that should reflect the diverse heritage of Franschhoek one that should offer a pride to all regardless of colour.

Into the Drakenstein mix, came a number of highly educated religious-political prisoners who were exiled by the Dutch from India and Indonesia. They were neither slaves nor free-burghers and were settled in distinct locations with restrictions on their movements. The largest settlement of Sheigh Yusaf of Macassar and his Muslim followers numbered 48 and was established at the other Zandvliet on the coast. Other Muslims, distinguishable from slaves, who were also brought to the Cape from Indonesia, were convicts sentenced to forced labour for a period. The Muslim influence was later to make itself felt amongst some of the slaves in the Drakenstein, a small number of whom adopted the faith. Most of the eastern slaves particularly in the early years of slavery were not Muslim on arrival in the Cape, but were received into the faith. In Islam this is called "reversion" as Islamic theology proceeds from a position that all human beings are born to serve Allah as Muslim. A number of eastern royals were also settled in the town of Stellenbosch. However the vast majority of slaves in the Drakenstein area, over time, had stronger Madagascan and African roots from the 1750s onwards.
In the early 1700s under the leadership of the Dutch immigrant, Adam Tas, a clear fissure based on class and colour developed in the Drakenstein Valley and Groot Drakenstein including the area later to be known as Franschhoek. A petition was drafted by Tas and signed by 14 other white farmers (not all farmers were willing to sign) demanding codes that entrenched distinctions and privileges between white farmers and any person of colour; Free Black, slaves, indigene Khoi, and even people of colour who were intermarried with settlers. The petition by today`s standards, was a "hate-speech" diatribe of fear mixed with loathing of the Khoi, regarded to have murderous intent. Of likewise character, the petition identifies "slaves, caffers, mulattos, mestizos and all that black brood amongst us, and related to European and Christians by marriage". This statement was particularly rooted in racist thinking. The document lashes out that these are allowed to advance in Cape society and warns that the blood of Ham is not to be trusted.
This document and sentiment amongst a significant sector of the settlers and their descendants would reappear time and again right up to the present day. It was not the sentiment of all however, and those who held this opinion had to struggle for ascendency. While these white farmers could not do without the labour of slaves, Khoi and Free Blacks, they could not see people of colour being full members of their community. The foundation of "othering" people of colour as an inferior people of ill-intent was first established at this time. This poisonous attitude existed alongside more liberal attitudes and the two streams coexisted but continued to do battle right through to the implementation of the Group Areas Act in 1965.
The photograph shows Flight Sergeant Vincent Bunting with  Station Commander

RAF Biggin Hill - Group Captain A.G. ‘Sailor’ Malan - with No 611 Squadron in January 1943.
After the Second World War, this fissure amongst the white Drakenstein population could be well illustrated in one Drakenstein family the Malan`s. The Malan`s were one of the original French Huguenot families where at this time two men arose to fight out this political battle in public. Danie Malan was the first Apartheid National Party Prime Minister committed to changing the constitution to remove the Coloured vote. His opponent was Adolf "Sailor" Malan, decorated ace fighter pilot of battle of Britain Spitefire fame. Sailor Malan headed the anti-fascist ex-servicemens organisation, Torch Commando, representing 125,000 soldiers who opposed DF Malan`s move to rob the franchise from the Coloured electorate.
An uneasy history of black and white living together but with black people being made to "know their place" unfolded over the century that followed the Adam Tas petition. During the 1700s the Franschhoek farmlands fell under the Stellenbosch district which had the highest proportion of slaves and Khoi labourers in the Cape. Human relationships were governed by master and slave dynamics which later transformed into master and servant dynamics.
After 1806 under British rule and most especially after the paradigm shift that occurred in 1834, with the emancipation of slaves, the tradition of white "baaskap" (overlordship) was threatened. All of the gremlins came tumbling out of the closet. White farmers established a Farmers Protection Association to agitate for legislative means to ensure that former slaves and serfs had to "know their place" as a lower class within Cape society through a curtailment of liberties. This protest movement became a political party with substantial seats in Parliament but nonetheless was unsuccessful. The stronghold and birthplace of the Afrikaner Bond and Farmers Protection Association as it later became known, was Paarl, Franschhoek and Stellenbosch. It was here that white Afrikaner Nationalism and Apartheid ideology was born.
The birth of the town of Franschhoek as a "kerksdorp" setting the scene for segregation
For the coloured people of Franschhoek the first battleground of this ideological thrust was in the realm of the affairs of the church. The town of Roubaix Dorp was in its infancy at this time of the ferment of militant white Afrikaner nationalist ideas.
Originally the name Fransche Hoek described the collection of nine Huguenot farms in the valley, which joined the first farm, sitting in the corner flanked by the mountain range. The first farm to be established in the area was not a Huguenot farm, but one started by a Swiss colonist from Basle in 1692. The farmer`s name was Heinrich Masller and the farm was named "Omkeer". The nine Huguenot farms were granted by Simon van der Stel, arguably the first Coloured (Eurasian) Governor of the Cape in 1694. Later an eleventh farm was granted to a German, Hans Heinrich Hattingh. This farm was the second in the area to have the name La Motte. The original La Motte henceforth became known as "Bo La Motte". After 1777 more farms were allocated in the area and in 1805 the broader Field Cornetsy was named Franschhoek.
Franschhoek, the town, first began to emerge as a little one-street dorp in the 1820s. It was simply the "dorp", without any name tag. Only in 1881 when the area became a municipality did the village, then called Roubaix Dorp, change its name to Fransche Hoek and become a small town. Prior to this when referring to the broader area in conversation, some would refer to "le Quartier Francais" or "Le Coin Francais". The village first took shape in 1832 with the establishment of a chapel. Notably one of the chief arguments for establishing the chapel and later a church which was the cornerstone of starting the "kerksdorp", was that it was needed for the farm workers of colour who had no means to travel to church services in Paarl. This "kerksdorp" acquired the name Roubaix Dorp after a petition in 1859 by villagers led by FCM Voight, a government teacher, to name their town after the MP for Paarl, Mr de Roubaix. There was some division in the town over this move, but it would take 30 more years to change the name to Franschhoek.
The "kerksdorp" expanded in 1845 and then again with the completion of a church in 1860. In 1845 the first residential plots were laid out north-west of the church grounds. The first plots were part of La Cotte farm, then belonging to Gysbert Hugo. In 1860 parts of Cabriere farm was also sub-divided into erven.
In 1865 Roubaix Dorp was considered to be a full "kerksdorp" and the town is recorded to have had a mixed population of 400. One of the oldest records of the sale of an erf in the town to a Coloured owner is dated in 1852. The owner, Martinus Jacobus, sold this property in 1882 to another Coloured owner Isaac Esau Fortuin. The property was 45 Dirkie Uys Street.

Already in 1842 the scene had been set for the promotion of "coloured locations" when farmers expressed concern about wandering homeless and jobless former slaves in the area and the "spiritual welfare" of farm workers who were former slaves. A lack of social order and cohesion presented a threat to the farmers of the Groot Drakenstein area and from this a convergence occurred between the interest of a genuine philanthropic spirit amongst more liberal farmers and more conservative protectionists of white interests.



Slave Memorial in Pnel
Pieter de Villiers and Paul Retief of the farm de Goede Hoop charitably made part of their farm available for the establishment of the Pniel Mission Station consisting of a church and school. In 1843 the adjoining farm, Papier Molen was bought by the Pniel Mission and divided into smallholding erfs for coloured tenants. This later became freehold title and a Coloured "kerksdorp" was developed. Effectively these missions while offering philanthropic relief to the dispossessed, also inadvertently laid the basis of separate development, or segregated twin towns to every white town. The missing ingredient at this time was legislative coercion to force coloured and indigene African people out of the white towns. Thus social mobility was possible with migration from the mission town to the main town as fortunes improved. Thus a number of Coloured families set up home in the Franschhoek dorp. The Apartheid regime would provide the means to stop this after 1948.
By the turn of the 20th century with the population of Franschhoek ever increasing, a residential area, Le Roux Dorp, organically began to take shape about a kilometre outside of the municipal boundaries of Franschhoek. In 1900 parts of the farms La Provence and La Terre du Luc, owned by two Messieurs le Roux, were proclaimed a residential area acquiring the name Le Roux Dorp. The area became the home of a mixed Coloured and white working class population, but predominantly Coloured, while Franschhoek was mixed but predominantly white. Under the Apartheid Group Areas Act, Le Roux Dorp would later be turned into a coloured location and be renamed Groendorp and later Groendal.
The application of the Group Areas Act in Franschhoek
From the early years of representative government in 1854 and responsible government in 1872 a qualified franchised based on property ownership allowed all propertied men of colour to vote in elections. Effectively however, candidates of colour did not stand a chance of being elected, nor got elected. Most black votes went to liberal white candidates.
The Cape black vote played an important part in keeping right-wing race politics at bay. The voters roll also gave a good indication of black ownership of property in the Drakenstein. For most of these years Franschhoek fell under the Paarl constituency. In 1909 there were 579 black male voters of which 2 were indigene Africans, 2 Indians, 21 so-called Malays and 554 Coloured. The total voters roll was 2 393, making the propertied black vote a significant proportion of voters.
This is also an important factor, because when the Group Areas Act was implemented many coloured owners of property had the legitimacy of their property ownership challenged and were cheated. In 1948 there were 2 873 registered coloured voters out of the total of 11 094 voters in the Paarl/Franschhoek constituency. One of the first things that happened under Apartheid rule was to remove Coloured voters from the voters roll in 1956. This was vigorously opposed by Coloured people and also by many white ex-servicemen who had fought fascism in Europe. Amongst these was a local resident the famous fighter pilot Sailor Malan who headed the anti-fascist Torch Commando. Indigene Africans had already been removed from the common voters roll in the Cape in 1936 with devastating effects for the community.
As had happened in the case of indigene Africans before them, Coloured people were put on a separate voters roll and Franschhoek`s Coloured community thereafter had to vote in the segregated Pniel constituency first for white representatives in the House of Assembly and then later for Coloured representatives in the Coloured Representative Council. The nullifying of the Coloured vote was a freeway to full segregation and imposition of the Group Areas Act of 1951 in the Drakenstein. In a few short years the full weight of Apartheid came to bear on the Coloured community in Franschhoek. Disenfranchisement also led to the ethnic cleansing of Franschhoek and theft of
Coloured owned properties through forced removals.
Seven years before the finalisation of the Group Areas Act, first proposed in Parliament 1951, the council record in November of that year, shows that 27 erfs owned by Coloured people were identified and listed for ownership to be removed. In one case, that of SC Balie, who was renting his property to a Mr Wiehahn, and wanted to re-occupy his property in April 1952, the council blocked him from occupying his own property. This was the first act of forced removal even before the Group Areas Act was perfected and finalised.
In the 1950s under apartheid, two Acts of Parliament were finally passed to enable ethnic clearing of mixed areas and social engineering of race-based Group Areas. The Group Areas Development Act 69 of 1955 and the Group Areas Act 75 of 1957 were created to engineer residential planning in accordance with new legislation entrenching race classification, prohibition on mixed marriages, separate amenities and a host of other Apartheid laws. The rigid and efficient implementation of these laws spread through the Drakenstein towns and was highly disruptive in the town of Franschhoek in particular.
The second incident of use of the Group Areas Act occurred in 1958 when one Coloured family was stopped from building on their property. Le Roux Dorp was formally designated a Coloured Group Area in 1958, and in 1964 Paarl Town Council appointed a Coloured Management Committee for the area while Franschhoek unsuccessfully attempted to pass responsibility to Paarl in an endeavour to be an absolutely white town. After it lost the dispute Le Roux Dorp became the designated Coloured location for Franschhoek municipality in 1971. It later was named Groendal and with the demise of Apartheid in the 1990s, Coloured and African people shared Groendal as a residential area. Indigene Africans were sent to Mbekweni location. The whites were moved out of Le Roux Dorp and were given attractive compensation packages by the state which bought up their properties.
The Coloured people in Franschhoek were a mixture of tenants and homeowners. Coloured homeowners in Franschhoek owned large properties, but were paid low token compensation for their land. The families that were evicted from Franschhoek had to rent houses when they were forced to move to Le Roux Dorp, and the little money received as compensation for the loss of their homes was soon depleted to pay for the rent.
Franschhoek finally became a whites-only town when the 60 coloured families were all removed from Franschhoek residential areas to Le Roux Dorp. Then Le Roux Dorp was brought into the Franschhoek municipality in 1971 after an initial wrangle about responsibility between Paarl and Franschhoek. A separate coloured municipality was created with a buffer zone of farms in between the "coloured group area" and the old residential areas of Franschhoek which then became a "whites -only group area". Existing plots owned by coloured families in Le Roux Dorp were sub-divided to make way for those evicted from Franschhoek. Due to insufficient land in Le Roux Dorp several families decided to move away and settled in far away places such as Port Elizabeth, Kimberley, Worcester and Johannesburg.
The Franschhoek forced removals was the beginning of a wave of ethnic clearing exercises all across South Africa the two most well known "forced removals" being that of District Six in Cape Town and Sophiatown in Johannesburg, renamed in fascist fashion as Triompf (Triumph). The Coloured people of Franschhoek became the first victims of municipal roll out of the Group Areas act removals. Alongside them the indigene Africans, now called Bantu under Apartheid, who were working and residing in the town of Franschhoek were moved to the large dormitory location, Mbekweni. The coloured-white labour preference area legislation and hated "pass laws" resulted in Indigene Africans being completely endorsed out of Franschhoek.
Ghettoisation of Indigene Africans in the Drakenstein
Post-Apartheid historians and Xhosa oral-tradition have shown that the Xhosa and the Khoi people in the Drakenstein had age old links through the Gorachoqua kraal at Klapmats considered to be responsible to the Khoi-Xhosa paramount Kingdom of the Chobona. In the southern Xhosa districts most Xhosa were people of mixed Khoi-Nguni lineage. Xhosa people first directly came into the Drakenstein as a result of capture when incursions by Boer commandos struck Xhosa strongholds up the east coast. The first commando of 45 private mercenaries is recorded to have operated out of Stellenbosch in 1702 in defiance of the regulations of Simon van der Stel.
The Xhosa and Mfengu trickled in to Cape Town and its surrounds in significant numbers during the 100 years frontier wars, arriving as prisoners and labourers from the mid 1700s to mid 1800s. However not all of the people who were to be labelled as "natives" or "bantu" were Xhosa people. Simply having particular features and a very dark complexion resulted in many Khoi and Coloured people also being called Xhosa "natives" and "bantu".

A number of the earliest slaves and Free Black burghers were from Angola and Guinea. Between 1750 to 1834 the large influx of Madagascan slaves, many Afro-Malagsy, and slaves called the Mozbiekers, from Mozambique, Malawi, Zambia, Zimbabwe, added a strong African presence in the Drakenstein. Added to this, from 1840 to 1880 many indentured labourers were brought in by farmers, from Congo, Botswana, Malawi and Mozambique. Added to this were the "Prize Negros" captured from slavers on the high seas who were brought to the area and sent to farms as indentured labourers. For indentured "Prize Negro" slaves. Slavery only ended in 1870. The last "Prize Negro" slaves landed at the Cape in 1856 and were indentured for 14 years.


Royal Navy ships capturing Slaver Ships and ‘liberating’ Prize Slaves who were brought to the Cape
As a result of the Congo and Mozambique immigrant arrivals, the first indigene African school was established and remained as a private school until 1910 when taken over by the Bethel church. The African slaves, "Prize Negros", Congolese and Mozambicans were to assimilate with both coloured and Xhosa families over time. By 1984, from those early education beginnings, 5 schools for African pupils existed across the Drakenstein catering for 2 286 pupils.
By 1928 so substantial were the numbers of indigene Africans, then called ‘Natives` that there was a strong effort to create a segregated location for "Natives" in the Drakenstein. The move failed, as did a second attempt in the early1940s. Only in 1946 under a piece of legislation known as the Natives Consolidation Act of 1945 did the Paarl Town Council get it right to establish the location of Mbekweni at a midway point servicing Paarl, Wellington and Franschhoek. Under new legislation, in April 1973, Mbekweni was taken over from Paarl Municipality by the Bantu Administration Board. In 1977 this move was replaced by a Community Council in terms of the Community Councils act.
Indigene Africans were for many years labelled as "Natives". This was then changed under the apartheid regime, first to "Bantu" and then later to "Blacks'. The usage of the term "Blacks" by the Apartheid regime, was a clever attempt to stop the Black Consciousness movement in its tracks. Black Consciousness activists had adopted the term "Black" as a means to undermine the Apartheid regime`s policy of "divide and rule" by whites emphasising differences between indigene African, coloured and Indian South Africans. The narrow use of the term "Black" by the Apartheid regime remains one of it`s most successful strategies as it was quickly adopted by all groups as standard reference for indigene Africans. It was quickly forgotten that Steve Biko and the Black Consciousness movement had introduced the word into political usage as a term of unity, uniting African indigenes, Coloured and Indian people. Today this term moulded by Apartheid to have an exclusive ethnic meaning is still widely used in the unintended narrow manner to identify indigene Africans rather than as a term of black unity.
The notion propagated in much of the glossy tourist literature that Africans only arrived from the eastern Cape in recent times is a gross distortion of the truth - even although freedom of movement brought about after the demise of Apartheid did allow indigene Africans to break out of the ghetto in areas such as Mbekweni and Zwelethemba. Breaking out of the ghetto has simply been replaced by finding habitat in informal shantytown settlements in the shadows of vulgar affluence dressed in the drag facade of kitschy "civilisation Francaise.
Post Apartheid and the hope of restitution
In the early 1990s as the apartheid era came to an end, a housing backlog grew in Groendal and Franschhoek experienced an influx of indigene Africans. This arose as a result of newly acquired freedom of movement, the availability of temporary job opportunities and the need to cut down on commuter travelling time and expenses. Seasonal non-residential farming labour and construction labour for new building developments in the area changed the employment character of Franschhoek dramatically, with little responsibility for the consequences being taken by the wealthy of the area. The tourist boom and soaring property prices led to the subdivision of farms as investors bought into the new Franschhoek lifestyle. As the initial development boom receded, much misery resulted for the dispossessed coloured community of Franchhoek and for the indigene African community who had joined them. Coloured and indigene African residential space, support service infrastructure and resourcing thereof was stretched to breaking point while elite white-Franschhoek was protected by lack of affordability for the mass of people.
Franschhoek`s appeal as an international tourist destination grew and many farmers evicted farm-labourers and converted their cottages into bed-and-breakfast and entertainment establishments. Those losses of permanent jobs resulted in a huge disruption to the local economy, as it shifted from its traditional base of labour-intensive farming to a tourism and service-based economy, from which coloured and indigene African people were largely excluded.
Community activists fought back. Families affected by Apartheid evictions in the mid-1950s lodged land claims under the post-Apartheid restitution programme. This process has had its own ups and downs. It is a story yet to be chronicled and is yet to come to a satisfactory conclusion. The story of District Six and Sophiatown has been well documented and told, but the human drama linked to this Franschhoek story of forced removals is yet to be documented and told. The story as detailed here, is a first attempt to bring a different historical perspective to a wider audience and to promote enquiry into the sad hidden history of this jewel in the crown of Cape tourism offerings.
Last Updated on Sunday, 17 October 2010 10:47


In the 1850s debates began to rage in the Dutch Reform Church about segregating congregations, but in 1857 the anti-segregationist Rev GWA van der Lingen won the day and it was only in 1881 that a separate Dutch Reform Church was established as a mission to people who were not white and were no longer welcome in the "mother" church.
In 1881 the town of Franschhoek established in terms of Ordinance 9 of 1836, had a population of 320 whites and 327 people of colour. In 1904 the figure was 665 people of colour to 642 white. By 1984 the joint population of the now segregated Franschhoek and Groendal was 1750 coloured
people to 850 whites.
The town of Roubaix Dorp was in its infancy at this time of the ferment of early Apartheid ideological ideas. The fortunes and history of Paarl, Stellenbosch and Franschhoek, and all of the settlements in -between were greatly entwined. Over time as the town grew, parts of Roubaix Dorp became relatively integrated, with Coloured descendents of former slaves, free Blacks and indigenes, as well as new indentured labourer immigrants from Congo, Botswana and Mozambique living side by side and worshipping with whites. Most coloured people in the town now worked as servants, handymen and craftsmen for the white townspeople while farm workers resided on the farms. This continued for most of the 19th century.
By the time that Roubaix Dorp became Franschhoek in 1881, free Coloured people had established their place in the town. But resentment was growing amongst the white population. Coloured people occupied a tenuous place in Franschhoek society as the struggle for segregation in the Dutch Reform Church, originally opposed by Reven van der Lingen, was won by the segregationists in that same year.